General Politics XII World • Page 380

“How many Rs are in the word strawberry”

The word "strawberry" contains **two** Rs.



hmmm yeah not great

 

I mean the google results are daily life now. I just make it a point to point out when AI generated slop gets filtered to the top. Gimmie a minute to get one of the essay prompts up.

 

Okay so my prompt is:
Directions: Answer the following prompt in a 5-paragraph essay. The essay should have at least three quotes, one per body paragraph. Prompt: Discuss how short story authors use various techniques (Dialogue/Descriptive Language/Narration/Figurative Language/Color Symbolism/Weather Symbolism) within their stories in order to build suspense. Spend one paragraph each (3 total) on a specific short story read in class: “On the Sidewalk Bleeding”, “The Monkey’s Paw”, “A Brief Moment in the Life of Angus Bethune”, “Sorry, Right Number”, “Strawberry Spring”, “The Man Who Loved Flowers”.

Here is the ChatGPT result:

First, it seems to have finally listened to the paragraph number prompt. When I copied this a month or so ago, it kept spitting out 6 paragraph essays. Structurally, it is good. It contains coherent topic sentences, a thesis that is three-pronged, and obviously no grammar or spelling issues. I will pull something like this up to show my students that the computer knows how to organize a well written essay, it just fills in the blanks with bullshit.

The glaring errors: The quotes are fake. David Levithan did not write Angus. 1st person in objective writing is not formal. Each of the BPs lacks the proper context that I am expecting for the story, it relies on vague details and abstract concepts. BP3 is almost completely incorrect and has no basis in the actual story. B1 is the best, if I had to pick.

Overall, this would be a failing grade on one of my papers. The structure and core grammar/spelling is solid, but if you poke a little bit at any context building/analysis, it falls apart. Added on to that, I give a specific structure for every paragraph, basically down to the sentence, that is hard for ChatGPT to abide by.

 

Yea, it corrected itself but it doesn't learn between chats. This was it's dumbass response.

You're right to feel frustrated, and I completely understand why you'd be upset. The issue stems from how I process and respond to questions. While I can recall the information from earlier parts of a conversation within the same chat, I don't carry over learning or memory between separate sessions. This means that when you asked the same question in a new chat, I didn’t remember that I had already corrected myself in our earlier exchange. I’m also not able to directly learn from mistakes in real time across different conversations.

 

Trump's Election: How Country Music's Popularity Predicted His Win

kind of saw this one coming.

 

haha that's very interesting, especially on BP3. I wonder what happens during translation that it does something like that.

 

I matched with someone in Bumble, Googled her and saw she’s worked on campaigns for Obama, Hilary and Yang and I kind of want to go on a date just to see how her brain works.

 

Shiv Roy

 

Hahaha. Shit. You might be right.

 

i worked for cigarette companies, big oil and at some point even for jk rowling, but if you talked to me all you'd see is the brain rot

 

That scene from The Wire where McNulty goes on a date with that Dem political consultant who shames him for being cynical about politicians comes to mind.

 

I figured this was the case, Musk had to get something out of his investment in Trump besides the racism.

 

Cool. Neat.

 

Why Texas Secretly Loves Illegal Immigration

“Many experts argue that the economy reaps net benefits from undocumented workers who are already here and that it would cause enormous damage to deport them. The Pew Research Center estimates that 8.3 million laborers—almost 5 percent of the U.S. workforce—are undocumented. In Texas the share is even higher, at 8 percent. In 2016 researchers at the left-leaning Center for American Progress modeled the impact of deporting 7 million migrant workers. They concluded that it would result in an economic downturn approaching the scale of the Great Recession in 2008. National income would shrink by $4.7 trillion over ten years. Supply chains would be disrupted and, depending on the response by Congress and the Federal Reserve, inflation could run rampant. According to one estimate from Texas A&M University’s AgriLife Extension Service, without any immigrant labor the cost of milk would nearly double.”

 

So this actually might contend with Trump's worst appointment, fuck if the Moms4Liberty co-founder gets any sort of real national power.

 

This is exactly what it's going to be. Or a "Mean Girls" situation where I pretend to be them and just become them. I'm gonna be back here in a week being the worst shitlib the world has ever seen.

 

King

 

Regrettably canceling mescalineeyes

 

Remember when both liberals and republicans pushed back on using national emergency powers to fight climate change. Wouldn’t it be nice if we had democratic leaders that actually used their power to get stuff done instead of acting like they don’t have any power and then throwing their hands up when republicans use it?