Blink-182 [ARCHIVED] Band • Page 821

Completely agree. Bands that have been around as long as blink with as many hits regularly play 1:45 to 2 hours. For blink that could equal an extra 3 to 5 songs easy.

 

Ahhh I just saw the Mumford v blink Brohemian video. Had a good chuckle. I still love that riff

 

Has anyone seen this recent interview with Tom? Man his voice has got a lot deeper since the last blink tour with him!

 

Guys 2 things...
1st. This album is great for long walks on the beach, a good jogging or a drive home while you're still a bit drunk from a party. Personal experience. Summer album ftw.
2. Hope blink starts changing that setlist. Drop the joke songs and play more California tracks (keep Brohemian)

.

pd. he sounds hilarious on that clip hahaha it's obviously slowed down.
pd 2. He mentioned Rabbit hole lol

 

I neglected Rabbit Hole once the album came out but I think that three song stretch of Left Alone - Rabbit Hole - San Diego is right up there with my favorites from any blink record.

 

An extra half hour in a blink set could easily signal an extra 8 or 9 songs really.

 

Ever since California came out I have been super obsessed with the live album, it's a shame they released it so early in their careers and there was no follow up. A live album with TOYPAJ songs would have been awesome.

Why aren't proper live albums more popular, you would think that they would be a nice cash grab for a band right?

 

Fuck, Tom... Why? Why?!!! Being your fanboy is insufferable now.

I dunno, if Mark's telling the truth (and I'm pretty sure he is), he and Travis wasn't even so mad at that point to ban him forever. Then why not to apologize and jump back? Fuck... No words.

 

Am I the only one still spinning this non stop or is it just me? Lol

 

Nope! I got to 470 on last.fm but then I started playing it on spotify to help with streaming. I don't scrobble spotify.

 

Yeah I don't think they need to drop any songs. Adding 3-4 new songs is only an additional 10-12 minutes of set time.

 

Sounds to me like the video is slowed down slightly, which is making his voice sound deeper than it is. You can tell when they play clips of Blink songs.

 

The Watch podcast has the worst hot takes about this band this week. Throwing shade at this album while heaping praise on Neighborhoods and even (lol) Dogs Eating Dogs

 

Was surprised they talked about Blink. Here's the link if anyone is curious: Ep. 54: Blink 182 Re-up.

 

i really just wish dogs eating dogs never existed.

 

bahahaha his guitar tone got so much worse too

 

I like how Mark keeps saying it's been 5 years since they had new music out, I appreciate his ignorance of that EP lol.

 

Dogs Eating Dogs > Neighborhoods in my opinion

 

I wouldn't go that far. I revisit it even less than Neighborhoods but I don't hate it

 

I still think it's a crime we never got a proper follow up after untitled.

 

We did. It's called +44. If blink had released an album after self-titled it would be been as bad or worse than Neighborhoods. Tom was just getting pulled in a different direction that made no sense from the rest of the band.

 

Though to be fair, I still really like We Don't Need to Whisper

 

I'd argue we just did.

 

Personally, I think this setlist would satisfy the masses

Cynical - Wendy Clear - What's My Age Again - Bored to Death - I Miss You - Feeling This - She's Out of Her Mind - Reckless Abandon - Sober - Stay Together for the Kids - Always - Rabbit Hole - First Date - Down - All the Small Things - Man Overboard - Left Alone - Carousel - Anthem Part 2 - California - Damnit - Family Reunion

 

Yeah I mean Tom's Angels and Airwaves template had started to be established on that album. That album was the best blink would be.