Remove ads, unlock a dark mode theme, and get other perks by upgrading your account. Experience the website the way it's meant to be.

Blink-182 [ARCHIVED] Band • Page 363

Discussion in 'Music Forum' started by popdisaster00, Jun 26, 2017.

Thread Status:
This thread is locked and not open for further replies.
  1. Nathan

    Always do the right thing. Supporter

    My 12 year old emo ass will always love Down. Cut California tracks for Dude Ranch classics.
     
  2. musicfan10

    Trusted

    Down sucks so bad
     
    bradsonemanband likes this.
  3. slimfenix182

    FUCKIN SAVAGES IN THAT FUCKIN BOX Prestigious

    Down is great. Like the rest of Untitled. It's just boring live, relax lol
     
    bradsonemanband likes this.
  4. musicfan10

    Trusted

    lol obvious and here’s your letter should be played every night! What y’all think?
     
  5. ComedownMachine

    Prestigious Prestigious

    Here’s Your Letter? Fuck yeah. I’d cut just about any song in the set for that one
     
    popdisaster00 likes this.
  6. Nathan

    Always do the right thing. Supporter

    Toast & Bananas! Apple Shampoo! Dick Lips! Peggy Sue! Pleaseeee
     
  7. oneeightytwo

    Regular

    They’ll always be constrained by their 90 minute limit... a 2 hour set would allow them to play the deep cuts whilst still playing the songs the majority of people have come to see.
     
  8. ZooZooChaCha

    Trusted Supporter

    Throw in She Wolf from Kuts as well - sounds like something off +44
     
  9. musicfan10

    Trusted

    Then why do they only play 90 minutes?!?! That’s stupid
     
  10. ComedownMachine

    Prestigious Prestigious

    Actually, they pretty consistently only play 70 minutes now. Even 90 minutes would be an improvement
     
    Audrey Horne and SlappinCups like this.
  11. TheJMan

    Trusted

    Even during their prime they never played more than an hour and 20 minutes except on rare occasions. The TOYPAJ, Pop Disaster Tour and Untitled tours they pretty much played between 70 and 80 minute sets each night. So this isn’t really anything new from them.
     
    Bad Frequencies likes this.
  12. BTDandFeelingThis

    Now I Know This World Isn’t Spinning Just For Me Prestigious

    Came to say this. You beat me to it
     
    TheJMan likes this.
  13. Audrey Horne

    Regular Prestigious

    To do 90 minute shows, they'd have to vastly improve their current live show or play smaller venues. It sucks that they don't switch up the set list but after going to too many shows the past few years, I get that the majority of people at arena shows probably aren't there to hear deeper album cuts. There's nothing about their show that would be entertaining enough for those people sitting further away and in the rafters to slog through a bunch of songs they don't know. In comparison, even with the stale set list, the 1500 cap Metro show was the funnest because the experience is completely different. They weren't struggling to fill space and it felt a lot less stiff and uniform.
     
  14. Richter915

    Trusted Prestigious



    One of the best setlists was at that show.

    (lol at mark having the guy come out to tie his shoe)
     
    bradsonemanband likes this.
  15. Analog Drummer

    Regular

    I wouldn’t mind if blink stopped. I’m happy for them to go on as is. But first break up felt like unfinished business. But I at least have that out of my system with subsequent reunions and albums now and am good
     
  16. Analog Drummer

    Regular

    That’s th Grammy nominated California to you
     
  17. Richter915

    Trusted Prestigious

    I actually enjoy Down a lot more live, basically any boring song Travis spices up with drum fills. They do that extended bridge and outro...it works for me.
     
  18. Richter915

    Trusted Prestigious

    Ok so conversation is getting dull here and before we go down another list binge I propose the below (it's a bit of a conspiracy theory...or maybe it isn't I don't know)

    Untitled was the beginning of the end for blink...from 1992 to 2003 they were the epitome of pop punk, arguably second to green day (note i said epitome, not "best band in pop punk"). Untitled comes out which is a very different take, people loved it lyrically because it showed "growth" while musically they had shifted away from NFG/sum 41/green day and more towards brand new/taking back sunday/jimmy eat world. Pop-punk of the late 90s was dead, emo-pop-punk had risen for the early 2000s. It was blink taking elements of the other bands at the time...they knew they'd always have us diehards but they needed that "mom where's my hair dye?!?!" crowd who got turned off by the skateboards and fart jokes. They were 16 but they were "mature".

    I consider that to be unauthentic and the beginning of the end for blink. They started incorporating the sound of other rock bands into their own. Their live shows completely degraded. Their set ups and kits were very different. It was not blink.

    Mark and Tom started diverging, just look at how starkly different +44 and AVA were as evidence. I always theorized that both of those bands just took the rejected songs from untitled that were too pop-punk or too experimental/stadium rock.

    Anyway, just a fun thought since the whole "I want a mature blink" thing came up. Last time blink pushed the mature bit, they broke up shortly after.
     
  19. Nathan

    Always do the right thing. Supporter

    I think untitled was absolutely genuine and authentic. You can see that in the cheetah videos and even how Mark talks about the record. Tom wanted to go heavier and try new things as early as TOYPAJ, it wasn’t out of nowhere. It was a logical growth, and just as much blink-182 as any other blink-182 album.
     
  20. TheJMan May 7, 2018
    (Last edited: May 7, 2018)
    TheJMan

    Trusted

    According to Mark he felt like the band was basically over after the TOYPAJ concert cycle ended but no one wanted to admit it or say anything about it. Obviously BCR caused a lot of the problems but Tom was trying to change the direction of the band as early as the TOYPAJ recordings while Mark was more comfortable making albums similar to Enema moving forward. Plus the guys were simply changing, they were growing up and families and lives outside of the band. Tom and Mark were just two different people now compared to what they were in 1999 for example, I think the break up was going to happen whether they made an album similar to Enema/TOYPAJ or not. Tom wanted to be like U2 and tour less and Mark just wanted to be blink-182.

    I will say seeing blink play in 2004 after they just did the Pop Disaster tour 2 years earlier, they looked and felt like a different band. There was hardly any joking/banter in between songs but they sounded and played the best they ever had. I think part of the reason was they were probably tired of being labeled as a joke band and wanted to show case their new mature sound. Of course the joke label will happen when you record songs about dogs, grandpas and depends.
     
  21. Ben Lee

    I drink coffee and dad my kids Supporter

    I don't know that I'd say their live show degraded after Untitled. They were playing the biggest shows they'd ever played and were HUGE at that point. Their live show was killer then.
     
  22. Mrk_Brdshw

    Dusted Groove

    I'd say if anything, the animosity between them at the time hurt their live shows (not as much banter and they played the songs fast as fuck but I'm not sure if that is to blame).

    Anyway, I've always said that Untitled just hit the sweet spot in their evolution. It happened at a time when their tastes were changing and when the scene was changing - they needed to adapt at least a little bit to keep things exciting, but that doesn't mean it was unauthentic. It was just enough change and experimentation to keep things fresh and interesting while also pushing themselves, but they still retained so much of their previous sound that it didn't drive people away. Plus, they hated each other just enough that it pushed them in different directions, but they held it together well enough to collaborate so the end result was perfect.

    Basically all of these things went too far after that point in time - too much animosity, too much experimentation, not enough collaboration, etc.
     
  23. Ben Lee

    I drink coffee and dad my kids Supporter

    I hear that. I always seem to love the records people make when they hate each other, haha! I can’t think of any others off the top of my head but there’s been times when you hear about the turmoil in a band and it created a great record. TBS comes to mind with like, New Again. I’ve also made some great music with people I absolutely hated, lol. It’s a weird thing.
     
  24. slimfenix182

    FUCKIN SAVAGES IN THAT FUCKIN BOX Prestigious

    Personally I don't care at all for how fast they were playing their songs live at that time. It was too fast. It was let's burn through our songs, not banter and get the fuck off stage since we can't stand each other lol
     
    bradsonemanband likes this.
  25. TheJMan

    Trusted

    I think it depended on the song, some of the songs were fine playing it faster and some sounded eh, I never liked them playing Feeling This at mega speed for instance. I think by speeding up some of the songs it gave the fans a new listening experience for that song too. They also did some cool stuff with the songs like The Rock Show where they slowed the bridge part down a lot and it sounded great. They also slowed down STFTK quite a bit too. And don't forget about the medleys they played with parts of Dumpweed/M+M's/Josie/Man Overboard/Dumpweed again.

    Even them playing their set list faster, they still averaged roughly the same number of songs played and their set time was around 70ish minutes so it wasn't like fans weren't getting the full blink experience minus the jokes/banter. I actually wouldn't be surprised if you took out the jokes/banters/encore wait times out of their older concerts and just tracked the actual time they spent playing songs they probably played more on that Untitled tour.
     
Thread Status:
This thread is locked and not open for further replies.