Remove ads, unlock a dark mode theme, and get other perks by upgrading your account. Experience the website the way it's meant to be.

Invasion of Ukraine • Page 175

Discussion in 'Politics Forum' started by Ferrari333SP, Feb 24, 2022.

  1. Ferrari333SP

    Prestigious Supporter

    Brother Beck likes this.
  2. justin.

    請叫我賴總統

    For the future of Ukraine’s security and sovereignty, all diplomacy talks need to include Ukraine joining NATO. It’s the only way to ensure there isn’t a “special military operation” from Russia years from now. I hope there’s no one that wants this to be repeated.
     
    Brother Beck likes this.
  3. LightWithoutHeat

    If I could just forget it

    I doubt they would ever agree to it. Part (most) of their reasoning for the invasion was to create a buffer between them and NATO states. Cementing another NATO state right next door is counter to that.
     
    Immortal1001 likes this.
  4. justin.

    請叫我賴總統

    Meanwhile Finland’s entire east coast borders Russia and there was no invasion. Russia simply wants Ukraine. Ukrainian sovereignty was never an idea that Russia liked.
     
    Ferrari333SP likes this.
  5. justin.

    請叫我賴總統

  6. Ferrari333SP

    Prestigious Supporter

    I think its a complete black box in terms of how any negotiations might go; in public obviously most of Trump's crew has been against helping Ukraine, but he has hired some pro-Ukraine people as well. And we know Trump likes to act like the Alpha dog, so that could influence how Trump responds to Putin, whether he threatens to unleash western weapons into Ukraine, or fully forces Zelensky to accept whatever Putin demands. Really have no clue how this will go.
     
  7. Brother Beck

    Trusted Supporter

    it is a sad state of affairs and a scathing indictment of the ineptitude of Joe Biden that I am actually a tiny bit hopeful that trump can possibly work something out here