Remove ads, unlock a dark mode theme, and get other perks by upgrading your account. Experience the website the way it's meant to be.

General Politics Discussion (IX) [ARCHIVED] • Page 1853

Discussion in 'Politics Forum' started by Melody Bot, May 8, 2021.

Thread Status:
This thread is locked and not open for further replies.
  1. iCarly Rae Jepsen

    run away with me Platinum


     
  2. Zilla, mescalineeyes, fowruok and 6 others like this.
  3. Easy way to fundraise.
     
    yeahrightdude likes this.
  4. MysteryKnight

    Prestigious Prestigious





    Federal government and state government gonna help me buy an EV next year
     
  5. David87

    Prestigious Prestigious



    interesting to see what the tax credits are for solar. I got a 30% tax credit, but it started sunsetting last year. Wonder if it goes back up to 30%, or higher, or lower, or what
     
  6. David87

    Prestigious Prestigious

    Would you be able to combine them both? I know sometimes with shit like that you can and sometimes you can't
     
  7. Government should provide free e-bikes for all
     
    Zilla, Contender, bigmike and 6 others like this.
  8. Means testing can fuck off
     
    Zilla, bigmike, Joe4th and 4 others like this.
  9. dylan

    Prestigious Supporter

    Need that EV tax credit so I can never afford to buy a Rivian like I want lol
     
    Zilla, Joe4th, Max_123 and 1 other person like this.
  10. Victor Eremita

    Not here. Isn't happening. Supporter

    Sigh. I guess we have to say better than nothing all the time but I just can’t be excited anymore with half ass climate bills.
     
  11. David87

    Prestigious Prestigious

    I was wondering if the tax credit could apply to e-bikes but I"m guessing not
     
  12. All new construction should be built with solar roofs
     
  13. MysteryKnight

    Prestigious Prestigious

    I was wondering the same thing. if I am reading correctly, the federal government is a tax credit and the state thing says it is $25 in incentives per mile of electric range for a total of up to $4,000. Idk seems like different things so I don't see why both wouldn't be able to be applied? Guess I would have to wait and see
     
  14. MysteryKnight

    Prestigious Prestigious

    I get your point, but on the other hand the expectation was set that nothing would get done this year because of Manchin. So if something gets done I'd take it as a win. I've just been operating of the mindset the dems don't actually have a majority in the senate with manchin and sinema there to give realistic expectations, so I can be excited if the largest climate investment ever actually happens even if it isn't enough.

    As always though, if it does pass dems should make it clear that the work isn't nearly done
     
    Victor Eremita likes this.
  15. aoftbsten

    Trusted Supporter

    Might be an unpopular opinion, but I don't think we should be giving any tax credits for EVs. For one, most companies with EVs on the market have waitlists. So these tax credits really just create more demand where there is barely any supply (which ironically given the title of this bill could actually just drive up the base cost of EVs in the short term). While I do sympathize with people who currently have fossil fuel-powered cars at the end of their lifecycle and want their next car to be electric, I get the feeling this will mostly be a tax credit for the rich as even with a $4-7.5k tax credit, the overall cost will still be very expensive for the average American. If we still want to use it for EVs, a better use would be to use that money to help manufacturers scale and speed up production. But even better would be something like this:
    An e-bike is way more affordable than an EV and a tax credit can actually make buying one feasible for average-lower income Americans. I've seen this up close with the popularity of the e-bike rebate program in Denver. Or hell, it doesn't even have to be for e-bikes. Give people a credit for buying ANY bike. Our car dependence is terrible for the environment, EV or not. Encouraging more bike ridership will help spur demand for better bike infrastructure.

    Which brings us to the third better option for those funds which would be to use it to build out better public transit and multi-modal infrastructure.
     
  16. Too hot for bikes let’s made the roads rivers
     
    Zilla, bigmike, mercury and 5 others like this.
  17. Zilla, mercury, DrAlanGrant and 2 others like this.
  18. MysteryKnight

    Prestigious Prestigious

    I get what you are saying but I don't think it should be a "give tax credits to e-bikes instead of EVs". A majority of people drive a car, and you would hope that their next car is an EV or hybrid. That's much more important to focus on I think than e-bikes. An e-bike would be nice but it isn't going to get me to work everyday, an EV will.

    One thing I would say about the EV tax credits in this bill, is I hope there is also a lot of money in there to scale up the charging stations and to research and manufacture faster charging batteries. That's the two main issues with EVs right now - not enough places to charge and people don't want to wait for it to charge. Definitely wouldn't buy an all electric for those reasons alone, sign me up for a hybrid though.
     
  19. imthegrimace

    the poster formally known as thesheriff Supporter

    I would be able to use an e-bike maybe 5 months out of the year?
     
    MysteryKnight likes this.
  20. David87

    Prestigious Prestigious

     
    aliens exist likes this.
  21. David87

    Prestigious Prestigious

    I could realistically use an ebike about 7 months, 8 if you get 30 days of warmth between November and March
     
  22. JulieLynn

    Karma is the Guy On The Chiefs Prestigious

  23. dorfmac

    Trusted

    just bought a plug-in hybrid over this past weekend. I get 50+ mpg on my 30 mile commute to work. Not too bad! Now I just wish my work had a place for me to plug in during the day.
     
    MysteryKnight likes this.
  24. incognitojones

    Some Freak Supporter

     
    Crisp X, Zilla, bigmike and 6 others like this.
  25. clucky

    Prestigious Supporter

    Is there a good summary of the overall real risks of Moneypox that both aren't intentionally alarmist or overly dismissive?

    Like, from what I've seen despite the rising cases there have only been a handful of deaths all in Africia.

    So obviously, there is some concern on what a huge outbreak could look like there. Which isn't good.

    But at the lack of US deaths a result of it being a slow killer (so the deaths are coming, they just take time), a result of or hospitalization system being able to handle it (but if the outbreak grows to the point of the hospitals being overloaded... suddenly things get much worse), or a result of it being bad but not deadly? And even if that is the case, what are the long term side effects like?

    I'm just wondering how fucked we really are we our if the combination of covid fatigue / poor leadership leads to the inevitable "everyone probably gets this thing at some point"
     
Thread Status:
This thread is locked and not open for further replies.