Remove ads, unlock a dark mode theme, and get other perks by upgrading your account. Experience the website the way it's meant to be.

Every Time I Die - Radical (October 22, 2021) • Page 56

Discussion in 'Music Forum' started by CTFFEMT93, Aug 9, 2021.

  1. AWasteOfATime

    @awasteofatime Supporter

    didnt know changes THIS Radical were coming...
     
  2. phaynes12

    https://expertfrowner.bandcamp.com/ Prestigious

    can y’all save your stupid and unfunny jokes for five minutes
     
    coleslawed, MFA, xapplexpiex and 23 others like this.
  3. strangeterrain

    Regular

    I just don’t understand. Keith has been sober on tours before, including entire Warped Tour summers. Andy hasn’t drank alcohol ever. When Keith had to miss shows because of his daughters birth, the band played shows without a vocalist just like they said they were going to do this week. I just can’t imagine anyone in this band even thinking about trying to replace Keith. Ugghhhh.
     
  4. Yeah who knows. I shouldn’t speculate at all and just hope Keith and the band get the help they need
     
  5. pretty sure the band’s account is probably ran by a TM or some sort - ill-timed scheduled tweet
     
  6. Jackbo487

    Regular

    this is all so terrible and upsetting
     
  7. Hunter Norman

    Regular

    He also removed ETID from his twitter bio which is.....well, a move to be sure
     
    beachdude and T E A L like this.
  8. jayreimenschneider

    Regular

    I’m straight up not having a good time.
     
  9. What in the fuck is happening???
     
  10. mescalineeyes

    disappear among the sea of butterflies Prestigious

    we were both half-joking. I just thought we could use a bit of levity but I misread the room. my bad.
     
  11. dadbolt

    Prestigious Prestigious

    I have to think that legally they can’t simply kick Keith out and continue on with the ETID name.
     
  12. phaynes12

    https://expertfrowner.bandcamp.com/ Prestigious

    i think it would be a bad decision but i don’t see why they wouldn’t be able to do that legally
     
    Drew Beringer likes this.
  13. Cameron

    FKA nowFace Prestigious

    The scheduled tweets need to end. This isn’t the first time this year alone it’s been bad timing/incentive to a event that wasn’t happening when scheduling the tweet
     
    sawhney[rusted]2 likes this.
  14. dadbolt

    Prestigious Prestigious

    idk $$$ or ownership or whatever I’m not a lawyer just spitballing

    anyways, this ad after your reply was perfect

    0CD229F2-6BD6-46AF-A996-7BB42A6BE7AC.png
     
  15. sawhney[rusted]2

    I'll write you into all of my songs Supporter

    I really hope they can communicate and find some mediation for the situation. I’m really hoping this is a big misunderstanding that’s being blown out of proportion. I’ve recently had that happen with my family as I’ve grown as a person and it causes severe miscommunication.
     
    coleslawed, ChaseTx, Mary V and 7 others like this.
  16. Owlex

    free snewt Prestigious

    I’m honestly not sure how many bands outside of maybe astronomically huge ones have their membership tied to them legally. Is that a thing?
     
  17. Hunter Norman

    Regular

    The biggest issue, a lot of the time, is record contracts/label agreements and payouts.
     
  18. stars143

    Trusted

    Yes? I would assume they're incorporated as an LLC or corporation. It's most definitely a thing. Anyone making a living from being in a band (especially for 2 decades) would be foolish not to have some legal entity setup for tax purposes and such.
     
  19. strangeterrain

    Regular

    ETID has its own LLC.
     
    beachdude and Hunter Norman like this.
  20. tvck

    Trusted

    wow this is a huge mess
     
  21. stars143

    Trusted

    It's not like they're filling up their tour bus with a personal credit card
     
  22. phaynes12

    https://expertfrowner.bandcamp.com/ Prestigious

    plenty of bands have had songwriting members leave, including front people, and continued on with the name. i doubt it comes to that and, if it did, the band would be better off from a PR standpoint continuing on with a new name but it is far from unheard of. it would be very odd if keith had sole ownership/copyright of the band’s name
     
  23. phaynes12

    https://expertfrowner.bandcamp.com/ Prestigious

    owners are removed from LLCs quite literally all the time. like, y’all are kinda just spitballing and way off rn. also, this doesn’t matter. i doubt it comes to any sort of legal issue. or i hope it doesn’t, at least.
     
  24. Hunter Norman

    Regular

    This ^. Assuming they have the pretty standard LLC setup (specifically like a lot of bands of their ilk have), it would be very common practice as far as moving on (once you get past the contracts and payout agreements based on the merch, recordings,etc.) but a lot of bands typically do it because it just looks better to re-brand and move on most of the time. I mean, imagine trying to continue ETID with no Keith......A lot of people won't be getting on that ride
     
  25. phaynes12

    https://expertfrowner.bandcamp.com/ Prestigious

    right. it’s more of a bad move for them publicly and would probably turn fans off. it isn’t a legal issue at all to continue without keith. he’d continue to get paid for the songs he contributed to but they can continue on without him. think of how many singers bands like chiodos or saosin or whatever have gone through