General Politics Discussion (IX) [ARCHIVED] • Page 1498

I know exactly what you’re talking about having driven through it lol. We flew into NY and took all the back roads into Philly cause I-95 was a disaster. Nothing but trees and then boom a neighborhood out of nowhere

 

In Strange New Worlds, they refer to January 6th as America’s second Civil War. Haha.

 

And what a Civil War it was.




































That lady got to tour the Capitol building and meet Ronald Reagan the same day.

 

He'd been with his team since Thursday, got back last night, and his photog tested positive today, so whether or not he contracted it AT the convention, he still spent several hours in close proximity who tested positive which isn't great. Still possible he doesn't have it, but it's not likely.

 

Got this for my nephew

 

Why would you explain the joke? Do you not trust his intellect?

 

no he’s honestly dumb as rocks, gonna be a cop when he grows up!

 

Got em

 

https://www.elisestefanik2022.com/

 

Also, I was in a wedding on Saturday, it sucked because I was just anxious the entire time. It was mostly ourdoors but it rained so that made it a little tougher to be outside and spaced out the entire time. The cocktail hour was in a historic building so that was mostly indoors, with the doors open. The tent had multiple flaps open and fans blowing, so decent ventilation there, but, yeah. And we already found out one of our close friends, the wife of another groomsman, tested positive today. Chances are she had already caught it before, but yeah, spent a lot of time near her.

I'm just a ball of anxiety now dreading the worst. Ugh.

 

Wife traveled for work last week, tested positive this morning.

 

cOvId Is OvEr

 

lol fuck this got me

 

based

 

Another loss but hey also another scathing dissent

 

Another example of how stupid it is for Democrats to claim for bipartisanship when a bipartisan bill (which even then was barley bipartisan) continues to get absolutely fucking gutted by a non-bipartisan Supreme Court.

 

Question for people, maybe any medical field people like @Richter915

I've seen antibodies reported in different ways on studies. Some will give you a number in u/mL, like the labcorp antibodies test tells me my "antibody count" is 650 u/mL.

But then some studies will show it as a "titer count" that is presented as a ration....like 1:80, 1:160, 1:2400 or whatever, etc

What is the difference between those two numbers? are those two totally different numbers, or would a 650 u/mL antibody count be the same as saying 1:650 antibody titers?